R v C [2022] (Stratford Magistrates’ Court)


Margo acted for a vulnerable woman accused of malicious communications during a 999 call on the basis of legal argument. The Defendant had said that she “didn’t care” whether distress or anxiety was caused; Margo successfully persuaded the judge that the statutory language “purpose” required more than mere recklessness.

Margo was instructed by Christine Thompson of Waterfords Solicitors.

Back to Cases